next up prev
Next: 5.iii.c. Shapiros' conjecture for the Lagrangian Grassmannian
Up: 5.iii. Generalizations of the conjecture of Shapiro and Shapiro: Table of Contents
Next: 5.iii.a. Shapiros' conjecture for the orthogonal Grassmannian

5.iii.b. The manifold of partial flags

We use the definitions of Section 4.iii.c. Let b:=0<b1<...<br<br+1=n be a sequence of integers. The straightforward generalization of Conjecture 5.1 for the The manifold of partial flags in n-space Flb is false§.

For a in Cn,bi, we have the Grassmannian Schubert variety

Za,i F.   :=   {E. in Flb  |  Eai lies in the Schubert subvariety YaF. of Gr(ai,n)} .

For example, if |a|=1, then Za,i F. is the simple Schubert variety Yai F. of Section 4.iii.c.

Example 5.11   Let b = 2<3<5 so that Flb is the manifold of partial flags E2 in E3 in 5-space. This flag manifold has two simple Schubert varieties

Y2 F.   =   { E.  |  E2 meets F3 non-trivially }
Y3 F.   =   { E.  |  E3 meets F2 non-trivially }


A calculation [S08, Example 2.5] shows that the intersection of Schubert varieties

Y2 F.(-8),   Y3 F.(-4),   Y2 F.(-2),   Y3 F.(-1),   Y2 F.(1),   Y3 F.(2),   Y2 F.(4),   Y3 F.(8) (5.10)

is transverse with none of its 12 points real.

Thus the straightforward generalization of Conjecture 5.1 is completely false. On the other hand, if t1 < t2 < ... < t8 are any of the 24,310 subsets of eight numbers from

{-6, -5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29} ,

then the intersection of the Schubert varieties

Y2 F.(t1),   Y2 F.(t2),   Y2 F.(t3),   Y2 F.(t4),     Y3 F.(t5),   Y3 F.(t6),   Y3 F.(t7),   Y3 F.(t8) (5.11)

is transverse with all of its 12 points real [So8, Example 2.5].

We have used more than 2.1 times 107 seconds of CPU time investigating this problem of intersections of Schubert varieties in manifolds of partial flags given by flags osculating the rational normal curve, and a picture is emerging of what to expect, at least for Grassmannian Schubert varieties.

Suppose we have a list of indices of Grassmannian Schubert varieties

(a1, i1), (a2, i2), ..., (as, is)   with   aj in Cn,ij

where |a1|+ |a2|+ ... + |as| is equal to the dimension of Flb. Call such a list Grassmannian Schubert data for Flb. We associate a composition c=(c1, c2, ..., ctr) to this Grassmannian Schubert data: cj is the number of indices il which equal bj. Consider the intersection of the Grassmannian Schubert varieties
Z(a1, i1) F(t1),   Z(a2, i2) F(t2),   ...,   Z(as, is) F(ts) , (5.12)

where t1 < t2 < ... < ts are in R and F.(t) is the flag osculating the rational normal curve g at g(t).

Conjecture 5.12   Let b = 1 < b1 < b2 < ... < br < n and (a1, i1), (a2, i2), ..., (as, is) be Grassmannian Schubert data for Flb.
  1. If the indices (i1, i2, ..., is) are in order, then the intersection of the Grassmannian Schubert varieties (5.12) is (a) transverse with (b) with all points of intersection real.
  2. If the indices (i1, i2, ..., is) are not in order, then there exist numbers t1 < t2 < ... < ts in R for which the intersection of Grassmannian Schubert varieties (5.12) is transverse with all points real and there exist such choices of the ti such that the intersection is transverse with not all points real.
In particular, enumerative problems involving Grassmannian Schubert varieties on Flb are fully real.

Remark 5.13  
  1. When each |a|=1, for every possible ordering of the indices (i1, i2, ..., is) there are real numbers points t1 < t2 < ... < ts such that the intersection (5.12) is transverse with all points real [S08, Corollary 2.2].
  2. When r=1, the flag manifold Flb is the Grassmannian Gr(b1, n) and it is no condition on the indices (i1, i2, ..., is) to be ordered, so this case of Conjecture 5.12 reduces to Conjecture 5.1.
  3. There is considerable evidence for this conjecture when r=2. Part (2) is true for every set of Grassmannian Schubert data in Fl2<3C5 and all except one such set in Fl2<4C6 (we are presently unable to compute any examples with this Grassmannian Schubert data). Many instances of these same enumerative problems have been computed, and in each instance of (1) the intersection (5.12) is transverse with all points real.
  4. As in the case of Conjecture 5.1, (a) implies (b) in Part (1) of Conjecture 5.12.
  5. We have tested no instances of the intersection (5.12) with r>2, so the truth may differ from the exact statement of Conjecture 5.12.
  6. Conjecture 5.12 has nothing to say when the Schubert data are not Grassmannian.


§This was in fact its original form. For a short discussion, follow this link.
next up prev
Next: 5.iii.c. Shapiros' conjecture for the Lagrangian Grassmannian
Up: 5.iii. Generalizations of the conjecture of Shapiro and Shapiro: Table of Contents
Next: 5.iii.a. Shapiros' conjecture for the orthogonal Grassmannian