Next: 5.iii.c. Shapiros' conjecture for the
Lagrangian Grassmannian
Up: 5.iii. Generalizations of the conjecture of Shapiro and Shapiro: Table of Contents
Next: 5.iii.a. Shapiros' conjecture for the
orthogonal Grassmannian
5.iii.b. The manifold of partial flags
We use the definitions of Section 4.iii.c.
Let b:=0<b1<...<br<br+1=n be a sequence of integers.
The straightforward generalization of
Conjecture 5.1 for the
The manifold of partial flags in n-space
Flb is false§.
For a in Cn,bi,
we have the Grassmannian Schubert variety
Za,i F.
:= {E. in Flb
| Eai lies in
the Schubert subvariety YaF. of
Gr(ai,n)} .
For example, if |a|=1, then
Za,i F. is the simple
Schubert variety Yai F. of
Section 4.iii.c.
Example 5.11
Let
b = 2<3<5 so that
Flb
is the manifold of partial flags
E2 in
E3
in 5-space.
This flag manifold has two simple Schubert varieties
Y2 F. =
{ E. | E2 meets
F3 non-trivially } |
Y3 F. =
{ E. | E3 meets
F2 non-trivially } |
A calculation [
S08, Example 2.5] shows that
the intersection of Schubert varieties
Y2 F.(-8),
Y3 F.(-4),
Y2 F.(-2),
Y3 F.(-1),
Y2 F.(1),
Y3 F.(2),
Y2 F.(4),
Y3 F.(8)
|
(5.10) |
is transverse with
none of its 12 points real.
Thus the straightforward generalization of
Conjecture 5.1 is
completely false.
On the other hand, if
t1 < t2 < ... < t8
are any of the 24,310 subsets of eight numbers from
{-6, -5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29} ,
then the intersection of the Schubert varieties
Y2 F.(t1),
Y2 F.(t2),
Y2 F.(t3),
Y2 F.(t4),
Y3 F.(t5),
Y3 F.(t6),
Y3 F.(t7),
Y3 F.(t8)
|
(5.11) |
is transverse with
all of its 12 points real [
So8, Example 2.5].
We have used more than 2.1 times 107 seconds of CPU time
investigating this problem of intersections of Schubert varieties in manifolds
of partial flags given by flags osculating the rational normal curve, and a
picture is emerging of what to expect, at least for Grassmannian Schubert
varieties.
Suppose we have a list of indices of Grassmannian Schubert varieties
(a1, i1),
(a2, i2), ...,
(as, is)
with
aj in Cn,ij
where
|a1|+ |a2|+ ... + |as| is
equal to the dimension of Flb.
Call such a list Grassmannian Schubert data for
Flb.
We associate a composition
c=(c1, c2, ...,
ctr)
to this Grassmannian Schubert data: cj is the number of
indices il which equal bj.
Consider the intersection of the Grassmannian Schubert varieties
Z(a1, i1)
F(t1),
Z(a2, i2)
F(t2), ...,
Z(as, is)
F(ts) ,
|
(5.12) |
where
t1 < t2 < ... < ts
are in R and F.(t)
is the flag osculating the rational normal curve g at
g(t).
Conjecture 5.12
Let
b = 1 <
b1 <
b2
< ... <
br <
n and
(
a1,
i1),
(
a2,
i2), ...,
(
as,
is)
be Grassmannian Schubert data for
Flb.
- If the indices
(i1, i2, ..., is)
are in order, then the intersection of the Grassmannian Schubert
varieties (5.12) is (a) transverse with
(b) with all points of intersection real.
- If the indices
(i1, i2, ..., is)
are not in order, then there exist numbers
t1 < t2 < ... < ts
in R for which the intersection of Grassmannian Schubert
varieties (5.12) is transverse with
all points real and there exist such choices of the
ti such that the intersection is transverse with
not all points real.
In particular, enumerative problems involving Grassmannian Schubert varieties
on
Flb are fully real.
Remark 5.13
- When each |a|=1, for every possible ordering of the indices
(i1, i2, ..., is)
there are real numbers points
t1 < t2 < ... < ts
such that the intersection (5.12) is
transverse with all points
real [S08, Corollary 2.2].
- When r=1, the flag manifold Flb is the
Grassmannian Gr(b1, n) and it is no condition on
the indices
(i1, i2, ..., is)
to be ordered, so this case of
Conjecture 5.12 reduces to
Conjecture 5.1.
- There is considerable evidence for this conjecture when
r=2.
Part (2) is true for every set of Grassmannian Schubert
data in Fl2<3C5 and
all except one such set in Fl2<4C6
(we are presently unable to compute any examples with this Grassmannian
Schubert data).
Many instances of these same enumerative problems
have been computed, and in each instance of (1) the
intersection (5.12) is transverse with
all points real.
- As in the case of Conjecture 5.1, (a)
implies (b) in Part (1) of Conjecture 5.12.
- We have tested no instances of the intersection (5.12) with r>2, so the truth may differ
from the exact statement of
Conjecture 5.12.
- Conjecture 5.12 has nothing to say when the
Schubert data are not Grassmannian.
§This was in fact its original form.
For a short discussion, follow this
link.
Next: 5.iii.c. Shapiros' conjecture for the
Lagrangian Grassmannian
Up: 5.iii. Generalizations of the conjecture of Shapiro and Shapiro: Table of Contents
Next: 5.iii.a. Shapiros' conjecture for the
orthogonal Grassmannian