In "Dots and Lines", do pay attention to the Preface (it is included for a reason), and let your mind rest on Russell's paradox; it is both important and subtle. While it was not the first such result in mathematics that indicated limits to our knowledge (look up the story of the parallel postulate), it is the first of several results in mathematics and physics in the 20th century that were counterintuitive and pointed to limitations in what is possible to know. It is also one of several paradoxes in mathematics; each of you will study you will study one such paradox in depth later in the semester for your term paper.
Newman's reading (I think) reproduces an English translation of the great Leonhard Euler's (pronounced 'Oiler') discussion on the Bridges of Königsberg (a city that was obliterated in WWII and is now called Kaliningrad. That city was the birthplace of both David Hilbert and Hermann Minkowski, two great German mathematicans around 1900. Euler's solution of the Königsberg bridge problem was an important beginning of graph theory, and of topology.
Tucker's piece uses graph theory to solve a simple (and on its face silly) problem. It is a good illustration of how graphs, while apparently completely unstructured, possess some structure that may be exploited to solve problems, not all of which are so silly.